Conclusion
A partnership of judges, attorneys, and mental health professionals is critical in the
resolution of high conflict alienation cases. A judge has the power to order changes
but is not readily available. Lawyers are more available, but do not necessarily have
proper understandings. As advocates, they can easily become part of a divorce
impasse system, aggravating an already inflamed system. Mental health professionals must
have a systems understanding and usually are available, but do not have the power of the
court, nor the legal understandings of the attorney. A partnership is
essential.
Attorneys must help clients discern long term interests regarding children, the
meanings behind a custody battle (hurt, revenge, fears) and ensuing alienation.
Attorneys must offer education about the importance of co-parenting and moving beyond the
battleground. Attorneys must treat with caution and trepidation a client who sees a
divorcing spouse as all bad and must avoid joining with the client in further escalating
this belief. Attorneys must refer to mental health professionals trained in family
systems, those who need someone who will work for the best interest of the whole
family. Attorneys must recognize when they have been enlisted as active parties in
the polarization alienation conflict, and seek consultation so as not to further escalate
the process.
Courts must act decisively and explicitly in cases of high conflict divorce and
alienation. Orders must be pragmatic and the grounds for decisions must be explained
in terms that make it less likely that one party can claim a moral victory and the other
feel shame of defeat. Courts must use their knowledge and power to understand the
family system, to recognize high conflict alienation cases, and to make appropriate,
timely and specific referrals and recommendations. By recognizing alienation in its
early forms, prevention of future harm to the child and family may well be possible.
Intervention, at any point along the continuum of harm is crucial to prevent further
harm.
Next
Back to Divorce Issues:
Main Page
|