 |
Adoration and shaming, the fairness and the horror
To Preserve and Protect — Examining a century of men and war and the 'changing' role of women in it
Preceding Page
Adoration and shaming, the fairness and the horror
It was and is never fair to have women cajole and shame men to be heroes, but that has
always been a very effective ploy. Nobody who doesn't have to be in the
frontlines and face the horrors of war there has the right to demand of anyone else to
provide protection for them.

To be protected through sacrifices made by others is a privilege that must be earned,
it is not a right. It is absolutely atrocious that feminists who
clamour for equal
rights for women vilify and slander all men and even blame them for wanting to fight
wars. That is just as true in peace times, in which, now just as always, for as long
as statistics for that were recorded,
men comprise 19 out of every 20 job fatalities.
It seems that the problem of whether or not to have women serve
in combat positions would be solved very expediently if all feminists were drafted.
The feminists would soon sing a different song.
My brother escaped in August of 1945, while in transit from an American- to a French
POW camp. He made his way home, just a few days after he had turned 18. Yet,
if he would have been caught by the German military during or shortly after the war, he
would certainly have been shot. The same fate was then quite possibly in wait for
him if either the French or the Americans would have caught him after he escaped. To
boot, after he had travelled back home (often sleeping in hay stacks during the day and
travelling by night), because he was an escapee the German officials weren't willing to
issue a ration card for him, so that he couldn't even purchase food to eat. That
is the gratitude of the fatherland in action. (Full
story translated excerpt from my brother's diary; MSWord file, 79 kB)
The gratitude of the Fatherland will be yours
One of the slogans used in Germany,
both during the First- and Second World War
(Der Dank des Vaterlandes ist Euch gewiss)
If the laws to force men to do the dying don't exist, they'll be created.[1] There has never been military draft for
women, and it is extremely unlikely that it ever will.
The force used to make men do the dying varies with the rank of men in the armed
forces. Those in the lower ranks are far more likely to be executed when they are
suspected of shirking their sacred duty. The Russian Army employed commissars in
combat in some cases one for every ten soldiers that literally drove men
into battle and killed them mercilessly on the spot if the men showed any signs of
faltering. When the German Army stood at the gates of Moscow, Stalin could not get
enough of his men to do the dying for Bolshevism, but enticing them to save Mother Russia,
the very Mother Russia whose idea and ideals he did his best to eradicate, that did the
trick
The British military executed 300 enlisted men during the First World War, men who may not
even have been shying away from dying for their country. It sufficed that the
leaders wanted to set examples to show a sign of force that no 'cowardice' would be
tolerated, at the pain of death. The same fate befell a handful of officers.
If officers would have been subjected to the same rigorous rules as their men, more than a
handful of them would have been executed for cowardice in the face of the enemy.
All of that is something that not one woman ever had or will have to face. Men's and
women's 'duties' are on opposite ends of that reality. Whenever required, most men
happily serve their women in "the field of glory." They adore them for
being allowed to do that,

The faces of these W.W.II British soldiers show adoration of
the female figure head of their nation... |
even if it meant little more for them than to live out their lives in
misery and pain, and to be spat upon in later years. Not long ago, one of them, a
wounded and decorated English war hero in the Second World War, hanged himself, because
the courts persecuted him for defending himself against young thugs who were turning his
life into a living hell for having been a soldier fighting for their country. He
suffered more than he could humanly endure, once for his country and then at the hands of
his country. Will his name show up on any memorial?

...even though their bodies and their lives have been
sacrificed for what she represents. |
And if that adoration isn't enough to cajole them into making the ultimate sacrifice
"for Home and Country," then there are far more effective means by which to make
men do it. The following poster was used for that in England during the First World
War. The government campaign that produced that poster had the
desired result but also some surprising ones.

Order of the
White Feather
|
Next Page: The Economics of War
|
Back to Ideology in Art__________________
Posted 2001 02 11
Updates:
2003 04 09 (reformated to break page up into several pages)
2004 11 04 (added link to Order of the White Feather)
2007 11 04 (reformated) |