The Head of the Medusa — Chapter 6: From the status of men to the status of women

Danae and Perseus drifted to the island of Seriphos where Polydectes was king. Perseus grew up and became a strong, golden haired young man. Polydectes heard about the beautiful Danae and asked her to marry him, but she rejected him. Polydectes would have taken Danae by force, but Perseus was there to protect her.

Human beings are far from perfect. So often it seems that the history of the human race is a long catalogue of destruction, but there is also progress. Although men and women have shared in both, it has been men, especially young men, who have been the victims of the destruction. The role of men has always been to defend, provide and protect women. The very word ‘husband’ means this. Though the average man or woman alive today will have a longer life and be healthier and wealthier than his or her predecessors, it is obviously apparent that women especially have a better deal than ever before and they have infinitely more opportunities.

The feminazis paint an altogether different picture. Things are apparently so bad for women that the United Nations has been spending billions of dollars and has spewed forth a constant stream of pro-wimmin treaties. These treaties or Conventions are legally binding by the countries that recognise them. They include:

The Convention on the Political Rights of Women (1952)

The Convention on Recovery Abroad of Maintenance (1956)

The Convention on the Nationality of Married Women (1957)

The Convention on the Consent to Marriage (1962)

The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1979)

The UN hailed 1975 as International Women's Year and held the first world conference on women in Mexico City. The next was held in Copenhagen (1980) and then Nairobi (1985). The Fourth World Conference on Women was held in Beijing, China (a country not renowned for its human rights or its attitudes to women) in September 1995. The United Nations spent $2.5 million to sponsoring the conference and $1.8 million for conference services as well as $700,000 for public information. China incurred additional expenses as the host nation. It took 12 days half- for the 4,969 delegates representing 189 countries to hammer out the Beijing Platform for Action The resulting legislation, presented as a great step forward for humanity, has cost us and will cost us, millions of lives.

When the UN was formally established in October 1945 the member nations agreed - "in fundamental human rights; in the dignity and worth of the human person; in the equal rights of men and women and of nations large and small...." But since then, the organisation that was set up to secure world peace has been pretty ineffective at stopping thousands of wars. It has been very successful however at assisting the new Nazis with the biggest war in history – the war between men and women. The United Nations seems to hold every nation in its thrall, when it comes to the rigid application of its women’s rights programmes. The "equal rights of men and women" have given way to an exclusive preoccupation with women's rights, which are deemed ‘different’ somehow. On the face of it, this all seems very commendable to the man or woman in the street, but just as in our own individual societies; the middle class political activists have been carving an even more powerful niche for themselves. The statement that ‘Women’s rights are human rights’ is very different from the concept that men and women have equal human rights. As in their individual countries, the radical feminist gender warriors are thick on the ground where the money is, and there is plenty to be had at the UN.

In Beijing, the UN and its Member States made commitments to "accord greater priority to the recruitment and promotion of women at the professional level to achieve gender balance, particularly at decision-making levels". These new reforms present opportunities for qualified and experienced women to be considered for the new position of Deputy secretary-general and for the newly planned cabinet. All very commendable and altruistic on the face of it. What could be better than to have men and women sharing these duties and responsibilities? The most eminently qualified people must, of course, make decisions and policies that affect the whole human race and the planet itself. Our survival depends on their skills and judgements. A responsible organisation such as the United Nations would not allow itself to be biased, infiltrated and taken over by an unelected group of non-representative fanatics, would it? Surely, no one with an ounce of common sense would believe the perverted ravings of the gender terrorist feminazis, let alone allow them access to such power, would they? You bet they would. You bet they have.

People who believe absurdities commit atrocities.

— Voltaire

‘Platform For Action’ is the most subversive document ever produced. It should be noted that non-elected radical feminist pressure groups and non-governmental organisations constructed it. It should also be noted that many other women’s organisations opposed it and fought hard to amend it. Thank God they did or it could have been far worse. Though its language may have been tailored to appear acceptable and ambiguous, it is nevertheless now formulated as international law. There is an international court to enforce it and there is a ‘Women’s Caucus for Gender Justice’ to see that its will is imposed on the section of humanity excluded from ‘Gender Justice’ – men. The other half of the human race was not invited consulted or represented at the conference. Why were men not represented? Men do not exist to protect themselves. There was not one organisation present to speak for the interests of the male of the human species. Consequently, in the eyes of the UN they do not exist.

The same insanity that has infected our individual societies now infects international society. We cannot opt out of this and we cannot avoid it. We have no power over this state of affairs. We have let it go too far. We did not elect these people and now they are there, we cannot remove them by democratic process. The dark angels now walk the corridors of power and they have begun the destruction. The new millennium has been proclaimed ‘The Century of Women.’ It will be so.

To Chapter Seven

______________
Posted 2000 04 21
Updates:
2000 09 11 (reformated)
2006 10 31 (reformated)