logo for the website of Fathers for Life
Fatherlessness, the lack of natural fathers in children's lives
| Home | In The News | Our Blog | Contact Us | RSS button | Share


Fathers for Life Site-Search

2013 04 15: Symantec (makers and distributors of Norton Antivirus) and O2 now filter/block the website of Fathers for Life and *BOTH* of its affiliated blogs. Click for details.


 
 Site Map (very large file)
 Table of Contents
 Activism
 Children—Our most valued assets?
 Educating Our Children for the Global Gynarchia
 Child Support
 Civil Rights & Social Issues
 Families
 Family Law
 Destruction of Families
 Fatherhood
 Fatherlessness
 Divorce Issues
 Domestic Violence
 Feminism
 Gay Issues
 Hate, Hoaxes and Propaganda
 Health
 Help Lines for Men
 History
 Humour
 Law, Justice and The Judiciary
 Mail to F4L
 Men's Issues
 Suicide
 The Politics of "Sex"
 Our Most Popular Pages
 Email List
 Links
 References - Bibliography

You are visitor

since June 19, 2001

Be notified of
page updates
it's private
powered by
ChangeDetection

BADGE
 of
RECOGNITION

censored-stamp

Yes, the website for Fathers for Life and its affiliated blog are being slandered and censored. (Click for Details)

If you are a fathers-rights or pro-family activist, then it is quite likely that your website or blog is being, slandered and censored, too. (Click to check that out)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Population pyramids for selected countries in the regions of the world


This page is a companion page to:

UN Population Policies, World Demographics, Job Fatalities and 
The Extermination of Men

Comments and notes pertaining to the attributes of the population pyramids shown below are contained at that page.


Selected Regions and Countries

Regions Countries
The World
Caribbees
Central America
North America
South America
Central Europe
Eastern Europe
Northern Europe
Scandinavia
Oceania
East Asia
South East Asia
West Asia
Central Africa
North Africa
South Africa
Algeria
Argentina
Australia
Bahamas
Brazil
Canada
China
Cuba
Ecuador
Egypt
Finland
France
Germany
India
Italy
Indonesia
Israel
Japan
Mexico
New Zealand
Nigeria
Norway
Panama
Philippines
Poland
Russia
Rwanda
Saudi Arabia
South Africa
Sweden
Turkey
Uganda
Ukraine
United Kingdom
USA

The US population characteristics are covered in additional detail in a separate page.

North Africa

Population pyramid: Algeria - 1991

Population pyramid: Egypt - 1991

Central Africa

Population pyramid: Nigeria - 1991

Population pyramid: Rwanda - 1991

Population pyramid: Uganda - 1991

South Africa

Population pyramid: South Africa - 1991

Caribbees

Population pyramid: Bahamas - 1991

Population pyramid: Cuba - 1991

Central America

Population pyramid: Ecuador - 1991

Population pyramid: Panama - 1991

North America

Population pyramid: Canada - 1991
See also Canada's changing proportions of people of school age, of working age and of retirement age over time.

Population pyramid: United States - 1991
For more recent and detailed coverage see US Demographics

Population pyramid: Mexico - 1991

South America

Population pyramid: Argentina - 1991

Population pyramid: Brazil - 1991

Central Europe

Population pyramid: France - 1991

Population pyramid: Germany - 1991
See also Germany's changing proportions of people of school age, of working age and of retirement age over time.

Population pyramid: Italy - 1992

Population pyramid: U.K. - 1991

Eastern Europe

Population pyramid: Poland - 1991

Population pyramid: Russia - 1991

Population pyramid: Ukraine - 1991

Northern Europe

Population pyramid: Finland - 1991

Scandinavia

Population pyramid: Sweden - 1991

Population pyramid: Norway - 1991

Oceania

Population pyramid: Australia - 1991

Population pyramid: New Zealand - 1991

South East Asia

Population pyramid: Philippines - 1991

Population pyramid: Indonesia - 1991

East Asia

Population pyramid: China - 1991

Will the populations of China and India, comprising a little over one-third of the world population, outgrow the capacity of those countries to sustain themselves?  The answer will surprise many, but in a way that is most likely totally unexpected.

Population pyramid: India - 1991

Will the populations of China and India, comprising a little over one-third of the world population, outgrow the capacity of those countries to sustain themselves?  The answer will surprise many, but in a way that is most likely totally unexpected.

Population pyramid: Japan - 1991

West Asia

Population pyramid: Israel - 1991

Population pyramid: Saudi Arabia - 1991

Population pyramid: Turkey - 1991

Is the world overpopulated?

If all of the world's people were located in the Province of Alberta (just a touch smaller in area than the State of Texas) and each were to have an equal share of all of the land in Alberta, then each of the world's people would have 98.6m2 of land to live on.

Assuming that the average household consists of three people, a family of three would have enough space (3,184 ft2) for a moderately-sized house and a garden large enough to grow some of the food consumed by the family.

  • Alberta land area: 661,565 km2, 255,541 miles2
  • World population: 6,706,993,152 (Source: CIA World Factbook, July 2008 est.)

It is obvious that the world's population density will be the controlling factor.  Is that a problem?  Will people any time soon be standing on each other's shoulders? 

How can the world be overpopulated if it is possible to fit the world population, fairly comfortably, into a province the size of Alberta or a state the size of Texas,  even if we divide the whole population into families of three and give each a bungalow and a good-sized garden to boot?

The following table list a number of nations, ranked by their population densities. 

 A table of population densities of various countries, with columns for country, area, population, and population density per km^2

Does anyone seeing those numbers still think that the world is overpopulated?

See also: The 1989 Montreal Massacre in the context of menís sacrifices, 2008 12 07, by Professor Jeffrey Asher.

Update 2010 08 26: I don't know whether anyone ever read the assertions contained in this footnote.  If the assertions were read, then everyone having read them must have thought that they were so outrageous and so totally-out-to-lunch that they were not even worth commenting on, because no one ever commented on them.  That is odd, given that so many people claim that humanity must be drastically reduced so as to avert ecological catastrophes of epic proportions.  However, consider something else, Phytofarm, that is: farming by means of the use of artificial light.

At the current efficiency of PhytoFarm, the entire present population of the world can be supplied from a square area about 140 miles on a side - about the area of Massachusetts and Vermont combined, and less than a tenth of Texas. This represents only about a thousandth as much land as is needed for agriculture at present (give or take a factor of four; for illustrative purposes greater exactitude is unnecessary). And if for some reason that seems like too much space, you can immediately cut the land space by a factor of ten: just build food factories ten stories high, which should present no more problems that a ten-story office building. You could economize even more and build a hundred stories high, like the Empire State Building or the Sears Tower. Then the surface area needed would be no more than the space within the corporate limits of Austin, Texas, to pick the first alphabetically among the many U.S. cities large enough.
    PhytoFarm techniques could feed a hundred times the world's present population - say 500 billion people - with factory buildings a hundred stories high, on one percent of present farmland. [My emphasis ó WHS]  To put it differently, if you raise your bed to triple bunk-bed height, you can grow enough food on the two levels between the floor and your bed to supply your nutritional needs.

The Ultimate Resource II: People, Materials, and Environment (1998), by Julian L. Simon
CHAPTER SIX, WHAT ARE THE LIMITS ON FOOD PRODUCTION?

I know, I know.  You must think about where all of the energy to produce the required light will be coming from.  Never fear, Julian Simon thought of that.  Read the book and you will find out.  Come on!  If you are sufficiently worried about over-population that you feel driven to stop reproducing and even try to limit other people's wish to propagate, you must be interested enough to read just one book.  No?  You mean you have your mind so firmly made up that no facts will confuse you?

_________________
2002 02 22 (inserted links to information on population distributions over time in China, India, Canada and Germany)
2010 08 26 (added update to footnote)