Fathers for Life
Fatherlessness, the lack of natural fathers in children's lives
| Home | In The News | Our Blog | Contact Us | Share

Fathers for Life Site-Search

Site Map (very large file)
Table of Contents
Children—Our most valued assets?
Educating Our Children for the Global Gynarchia
Child Support
Civil Rights & Social Issues
Family Law
Destruction of Families
Divorce Issues
Domestic Violence
Gay Issues
Hate, Hoaxes and Propaganda
Help Lines for Men
Law, Justice and The Judiciary
Mail to F4L
Men's Issues
The Politics of "Sex"
Our Most Popular Pages
Email List
References - Bibliography

You are visitor

since June 19, 2001

Back to:

Advice to Men

CPS* child apprehensions in Michigan

*CPS: Child Protective Services (also known in some localities as Children's Aid Society (CAS), Family Independence Agency (FIA), Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (SPCC - in the U.K.), Jugendamt (Youth Office - in Germany), etc., etc....)

[Feminists say:]

...That divorce shall be made easy.

That there may be a "novitiate of marriage," in other words, a "trial marriage," and that after a period, if either party is not pleased, the final "mating" need not be consummated.

[That] if children should result from such "trial," the duty of the state is to care for them, and the parties may enter into other "novitiates." [My emphasis —WHS]

If a Feminist wife works at household duties, she demands wages from her husband for domestic service, but household duties would be better done by expert "household engineers"—the wife going to work outside, and the children being sent to a state nursery, kindergarten to school. ...  [My emphasis —WHS]

In advocacy to this "New Freedom" she has many journals, among others being the "Bondwoman" and Harper's Weekly. She tells all sorts of lies about the "inhumanity" of man to woman, men with their inborn chivalry have been maligned without protest, mistaking these female hyena iconoclasts for women.

—Benjamin V. Hubbard,
Socialism, Feminism, and Suffragism, 1915, pp. 142-144;

The preceding excerpts are from a more extensive quote shown at the last of the subsequent three related URLs.




Why Child Apprehensions?

Give me your 4-year-olds, and within a generation I'll construct a Socialist State.

— Lenin

[During Hitler's regime]...in a series of coldly and shrewdly calculated moves, radical extremists usurped the youth movement that was very much splintered along political and religious ideological lines and consolidated it into a unified and rigorously controlled sector of the German population.  The slogan that motivated the Nazi leaders was an adaptation of a slogan attributed to Napoleon "Who controls the youth controls the future!"  (Wer die Jugend hat, hat die Zukunft), although its origins go back to Socrates (whom Plato, in Republic, has offer this advice to philosopher kings: "Take all the children from their parents and rid the city of adults."), and, as the history of Ancient Greece shows with respect to Sparta, even farther back in antiquity.
   Hitler made it quite clear that he had a very good appreciation of the import of that slogan and made sure that it was central to his evil agenda.  He wrote in Mein Kampf that the State, 

...must set race in the center of all life.  It must take care to keep it pure. It must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people. It must see to it that only the healthy beget children....[my emphasis —WHS]

Excerpted from: Der Struwwelpeter (Slovenly Peter): Can a children's book have a connection to the rise of Nazism to power?

What worked for the USSR, for Hitler's regime, for the People's Republic of China or for any other totalitarian regime will work just as well if the regime is totalitarian feminism.  Regardless of the ideology driving them, it is the strategy and the tactics used to implement it that count.

"President Obama is committed to helping states develop seamless, comprehensive, and coordinated 'Zero to Five' systems to improve developmental outcomes and early learning for all children....it will be the goal of this Administration to ensure that every child has access to a complete and competitive education -- from the day they are born to the day they begin a career."

(Fact Sheet: Expanding the Promise of Education in America, Mar 10, 2009
see also:
Remarks of President Barack Obama
As Prepared for Delivery Address to Joint Session of Congress, Tuesday, February 24th, 2009)

First they came for the fathers, then for the mothers, and now for both parents in intact families. In the end all children will be in the care, custody and control of the State.   That goal is part and parcel of the agenda for the implementation of the planned destruction of the family.

The planned destruction of the family was part of the communist agenda from its inception by Karl Marx and Frederic Engels.   It became government policy in the USSR in about 1917. It was so successful in the USSR that it threatened to destroy society in the USSR.  Curiously, while in the 1940s the USSR took steps to repair the damages its family-hostile policies had caused, American communists imported the Soviet agenda for the planned destruction of the family into the USA.  It has been and continues to be promoted by left-leaning liberals in the West ever since. (Source)

Here is how things are done now, and the tactics differ imperceptibly little from those used in any other totalitarian regime throughout history:

CPS Watch - Special Reports & Articles (The Link no longer functions)

Protest the CPS - Demand Reform in Child Protection Laws

The FIA Game

By Attorney Janet M. Frederick-Wilson

Many citizens in our great State of Michigan are unaware of Michigan's dirty little secret that falls under the guise of the Child Abuse and Child Welfare Protection Laws. The advertisements and literature surrounding this area seem to be doing a magnificent thing for the children of our state. We have been led to believe that the State of Michigan is saving thousands of children from severe physical abuse and neglect. This is far from the truth.

The truth is that this campaign is a giant money machine fueled by abuse of power of supervisors and case service workers employed by the Michigan Department of Family Independence Agency and private agencies that have contracted with FIA that we, the tax payers, are paying dearly for through our hard earned tax dollars. Basically it is "make work by creating a case and keep your job or contract with the state government."

The current campaign to save the children is doing just the opposite. Parents and children are being permanently separated and families are being permanently destroyed under this new plan as a result of abuse of power in the name of more state and federal funding.

I have been working extensively in this area of law for approximately two years. All of the cases that I am working on do not involve children suffering from broken bones, bruises or starvation. In fact most of the cases that I am involved in regard parents that merely spanked their children by giving the children one or two swats on the clothed behind, parents who have physically defended themselves from a physically violent teenager, parents who argued in front of their children, recently divorced single parents, parents with low incomes, parents who have failed to take their child to a doctor for mere cold symptoms such as sniffles and mild congestion, or parents who owned pornographic materials stored in a safe place where the children broke into and viewed the materials.

According to FIA, the present state of law is that:

  1. Parents cannot spank their child. Spanking, even with clothes covering the bottom, is severe physical abuse. Parents are only to use time out, reasoning and loss of privileges.

  2. Parents cannot engage in physical self defense to protect themselves from a physically hostile teenager. An act of self defense by a parent is severe physical and emotional abuse. Parents are to use reasoning, time out and loss of privileges only and must sacrifice their physical safety for their violent teenager's safety.

  3. Parents cannot argue or talk about adult subjects, such as family finances, in front of their children. These are subjects that the child has no control over and [arguments about them] create extreme emotional distress in the child. FIA has classified this area as emotional or environmental abuse and/or neglect of the child.

  4. Parents with low income are neglecting their children's basic needs. Low-income parents cannot provide for the proper medical, physical or emotional needs of their children due to their limited income. The parents' failure to obtain middle income jobs means environmental, medical and emotional neglect.

  5. Parents that fail to take their child to the family physician for colds, flu, sniffles and mild congestion, or parents who fail to obtain a family pediatrician are neglecting the medical needs of their children. FIA has classified this as medical neglect.

  6. Parents who own pornographic materials, such as magazines, books, and video tapes, and conceal such materials from their children have created environmental and emotional neglect of their children. Parents who own and hide such material run the risk that children will find these material and view them causing emotional harm to their children. FIA has classified this as environmental neglect.

  7. Divorced, single parent families seem to be targeted by FIA as high risk environments for emotional and environmental neglect. Most single-parent families have low incomes and of course, according to FIA, cannot provide for the basic needs of the children as measured against middle income standards.
         Single parents work outside of the home, leaving their children unattended or with "inappropriate care takers" (neighbors, older siblings, grandparents, relatives) causing environmental and emotional neglect of the child. Single working parents are unable to clean their homes "appropriately" and leave their homes cluttered, disorganized, and untidy (i.e. beds unmade, dirty clothes on floors or hampers, dirty dishes in the sink from breakfast, unswept or unvacuumed floors and carpets, etc.) which the family must return to in the afternoon or evening are classified as causing environmental neglect.
         Basically, single parents tend more to their needs (i.e. working outside of the home) than to the needs of their children, which is classified as emotional and environmental neglect.

Ironically, FIA compiles a list of single parent households from the Friend of the Court, sends prevention workers to the homes of such families and initially offers the families free, voluntary services through their prevention program. Such services include free parenting classes, free nutrition programs, free household budgeting programs, free employment training programs, and WIC. The social workers in these programs compile information on the family and home for FIA.

Basically, when you allow these workers to enter your lives and your home, you are allowing FIA to build a PS (Protective Services) record against you for child neglect, that leads to further child protective proceedings in the Probate/Family Court, which will ultimately result in the removal of your children and the children being placed in foster care. These workers are not hired to help you, they are hired to make a case of child neglect against you.

Why are families being targeted by FIA? Most people have the misconception that concerned citizens report child neglect and abuse. That is untrue! Only a small percentage of my cases involve reports of neglect and abuse from neighbors, family members, friends and school officials. In fact, the majority of my cases involved the family receiving some form of voluntary services from FIA, such as the free programs listed above. In the majority of cases, school officials, such as teachers and counselors, never suspected child abuse or neglect in the families that were prosecuted. Moreover, in most cases the family physicians never suspected child abuse or neglect in the families prosecuted. Families are targeted because FIA must justify its need for State and Federal grants to keep its workers employed.

Currently, FIA receives, in Federal grants, $2,000 to $4,000 per month per child in foster care and $10,000 per child adopted out into permanent homes after the parent's rights have been terminated due to alleged neglect and abuse. The State of Michigan provides matching funds to FIA. Bill Clinton recently signed new legislation providing for an additional $2,000 to $4,000 per month per child in foster care and $10,000 for adoption. FIA is making money hand over fist through our tax dollars. FIA social workers receive bonuses for removing children from their homes and for adoption. The incentive for abuse of power is extremely high and has occurred at alarming rates.

During 1996, Clare County removed 50% of the children in the county for neglect and abuse in the home. It is very hard to comprehend that 50% of the parents in Clare County are neglecting and abusing their children. Clare County is a "demonstration county" that is a pilot county for The Binsfield Laws supported by Federal Grants. These programs involve privatizing the foster care system. The foster care program hires private industry to service the foster care needs of the county children removed from the home.

Currently, Eagle Village in Hersey, Michigan holds the foster care contract for Clare County FIA.

How does the system work? FIA initially offers families free, voluntary services through prevention services to the families on the FOC (Friend of the Court) files, AFDC files, Employment Security Commission files, Social Security files, etc., such as free parenting classes, free nutrition programs, free homemaker services, free budgeting classes, free employment training programs, etc. The prevention worker works closely with the family to coordinate these free services by meeting with the family in their home on a regular basis, once or twice per week. While working with the family, the worker identifies problems areas that put the children at risk for abuse and neglect so as to qualify the family for these free services, such as poor parenting skills, homemaker skills, budgeting skills, and employment-seeking skills.

The flip side of this arrangement is that the worker is building a case of neglect and abuse against the parents. Most problems identified are lack of bonding with the children and nurturing due to the parents participation in these free programs. Basically, the parents are putting their needs before the children's needs by focusing on their problems as identified in their participation in these programs. Furthermore, workers in these programs work in tandem with FIA to identify other risk factors such as poor parenting skills, why else would a parent take a free parenting class if they themselves have admitted to having poor parenting skills. Voluntarily entering into these programs is an actual admission to poor parenting-, nutrition-, homemaker-, budgeting- or employment-seeking skills that put the child at risk for neglect and abuse that thereby lays the foundation for child protective proceedings in the Probate/Family Court.

The Courts believe that the FIA workers are the professionals and take their word as gold. The parents cannot defend against FIA. The testimony and statements given by the parents mean nothing in the Probate/Family Court. In fact the Court can issue an emergency pick-up order for the children based on only FIA's statements in an ex-parte hearing conducted by the judge and the FIA worker.

The parents are not present during these hearings. The Court will issue an ex-parte emergency order allowing the FIA workers to enter the home or child's school to remove the child from the parents' custody. The parents do get a hearing approximately two weeks after the removal of the child, but FIA is only required to prove that probable cause exists that the children are at risk of neglect and abuse if they remain in the home.

Approximately 90 days later the parents may have a trial to determine whether by a preponderance of the evidence the children are at risk of abuse or neglect if they are returned to the home. Most parents plead to abuse or neglect upon FIA's promise that if the parents plead and engage in services, they will get their children back sooner. Most parents plead to charges that they have a temper, that they have beaten their children by merely spanking them, that they have failed to provide the child with medical attention when they had cold symptoms, or that they are unable to provide for the basic needs of the child because they are temporarily unemployed. The Court then takes jurisdiction over the children, places them in foster care and orders the parents to follow the Parent/Agency Agreement to be drafted by FIA. FIA then engages in a lengthy and vague process of ordering the parents to engage in specific services, such as individual counseling, parenting classes again, anger management classes and counseling, psychological evaluations, drug and alcohol testing, -classes and -counseling, etc.. 

Once parents complete these services, FIA informs the parents, usually during a court proceeding, that they have not dealt with the proper issues in these programs that initially led to the removal of the children, or that the parents have not satisfactorily completed the programs because they will not or are not mentally able to comprehend their actions and the effect of their actions that have harmed their children. It is a no-win situation. FIA is in complete control of the interpretation of whether the parents have successfully completed the Parent/Agency Agreement.

Furthermore, if the parents elect to participate in FIA's services with their hired agencies, then the parents never successfully complete the Parent/Agency Agreement. These agencies are FIA's hired hands that build a case against the parents. If the parents elect to engage in services provided by professionals of their choice or referred by their HMO or other health care providers, then the parents must pay enormous amount of money for these services and for these professionals to come to court on their behalf to testify. More importantly, the Court views expert witnesses hired by the parents as hired hands and discounts any testimony given by these professionals as being adversarial and unbelievable. FIA and some of the Courts have gone as far as accusing the parents of failing to comply with the Parent/Agency Agreement by engaging their own professionals for service which has been deemed grounds for termination of parental rights. It is a no-win situation that fails to focus on the best interest of the child.

Also, most children are placed with foster parents who intend to adopt the children. The purpose of placement is to find the children a permanent, stable and safe environment which they can live with dignity and respect. The focus in Michigan is no longer keeping families together by repair or rehabilitating parents to properly care for their children. The focus in Michigan and across the country now is to quickly place children into permanent homes. This means the pool of foster parents are usually upper middle class with financial security. The children are then introduced to the finer things in life like Reeboks, Nikes, Starter Jackets, designer clothes, and other luxuries that the average working class or middle class family cannot afford to provide for their children. The children readily associate with their new parents as being the good parents that can provide for their needs and the biological parents as being abnormal, dysfunctional, poor, and unable to meet their new basic needs. Some children do not want to come home because they cannot live the new life provided by their foster parents to which they have become accustomed to during foster care.

This system of protective services and foster care is very disturbing. During this whole process, the Department of FIA is raking in the Federal and State grants to support its preventive, protective, and foster care programs. These are our tax dollars at work and are being misappropriated and wasted to create a foster care and adoption industry in our state. I am not arguing that there are never cases of child abuse or neglect in this state. There are real cases of that sort for which proper social nets are needed. However, our current system is froth with abuse of power and waste of precious tax dollars that created false allegations of child abuse and neglect for the purpose of creating employment for social workers and private industries providing foster care services, counseling agencies that provide individual therapy and psychological evaluations, and community education programs that provide anger management and parenting classes. All of these agencies are funded by our tax dollars which are being wasted on parents who are only less than perfect and on children who are not abused or neglected in the legal sense.

Furthermore, all parents are court ordered to pay child support to the foster parents through the Friend of Court for the care of their children while in foster care. Parents pay an average of $25.00 to $30.00 per week per child if FIA is providing the foster care family through its county agency. Parents pay approximately $150 to $2,000 per month if a private agency is hired by FIA to provide foster care services. Nobody is sure where that money goes once it is paid to the Friend of the Court.

The system of FIA needs to be restructured to make its workers accountable for their actions. Presently, FIA workers have complete immunity from civil actions in the State of Michigan, unless a parent can prove that a worker was grossly negligent in the performance of his or her duties. Unfortunately that is impossible to prove. If a parent pleads or the Probate Court finds that it has jurisdiction over the child for neglect and abuse, FIA continues to have jurisdiction over the child and ultimately terminates the parents rights.  That will bar any suit against the FIA worker under the immunity doctrine.

Once your child is in the system, FIA and its social workers are not accountable for the workers' actions. The courts accept the workers' word as gold. The only recourse a parent has is to appeal the Probate/Family Court's decision, which is very expensive. Most of the parents who are my clients spent approximately $10,000 to $20,000 in defending against FIA in child protection cases, even when they pleaded guilty. Most of my parents end up losing their homes, vehicles, jobs because of court appearances and engagement of professional services, and savings. Most of my parents are forced into bankruptcy. [*]

* Ed. Note: See also Big Sister Is Watching!

An epidemic of state-sponsored kidnapping feeds a tyrannical system hungry for revenues.  Child Protective Services and Children's Aid Societies systematically and increasingly often rob children from their parents.  Kafkaesque chicaneries that the targeted families find impossible to comply with are the tools used to keep the revenues rolling in.  Many families don't survive the ordeals that they are being subjected to by any given CPS or CAS. 

The goal of state-control, even state-ownership, of children has been the mark of all totalitarian regimes throughout history.  Its roots go back into antiquity, where in ancient Sparta children that dared to cry when exposed to hardship were killed.
   It began on a large scale in the USSR — from the very start of the Russian Revolution.  It continued to be pursued in Nazi Germany, in all of the communist countries, in Communist East Germany, and especially in the People's Republic of China.

Now that feminism spread from its communist roots (see Matriarchy in USSR off-site) to the whole world, the forcible removal of children from their parents' homes is escalating and spreading throughout the world as well, foremost in those countries where feminist totalitarianism made the greatest advances.

The pursuit of the planned destruction of the family is part of the systematic re-engineering not only of civilization but of humanity itself.   Think of it as evolution in action. 

It is unavoidable: in any society in which the basest ideology (the one that is the cheapest because it requires no sacrifice or effort to uphold or promote it) is permitted to thrive unopposed and in which all moral standards are normalized down to the level of that ideology, that ideology, no matter how deplorable or despicable it may be in absolute terms, will rise to dominate all others.

The hungry sheep look up, and are not fed,
But swoln with wind, and the rank mist they draw,
Rot inwardly, and foul contagion spread.

— Milton: "Lycidias"

See also:

  • From Marxism to Feminism: The planned destruction of the American family
    Statement of Bill Wood
    FC-8 Hearing on Waste, Fraud, and Abuse July 17, 2003

  • Politics, by Aristotle (350 BC), specifically Aristotle's remarks pertaining to the license of the Lacedaemonian women in relation to the Spartan Constitution and the fate of Sparta that resulted from women's licentious behaviour.

  • See also Big Sister Is Watching!

    An epidemic of state-sponsored kidnapping feeds a tyrannical system hungry for revenues.  Child Protective Services and Children's Aid Societies systematically and increasingly often rob children from their parents.  Kafkaesque chicaneries that the targeted families find impossible to comply with are the tools used to keep the revenues rolling in.  Many families don't survive the ordeals that they are being subjected to by any given CPS or CAS. 

  • Feminism For Male College Students A Short Guide to the Truth, by Angry Harry (Off-Site)

Back to Index for Issues Relating to Child Apprehensions

whiterose.gif (6796 bytes)The White Rose
Thoughts are Free

Posted 2001 08 08
2003 08 01 (added reference to From Marxism to Feminism: The planned destruction of the American family)
2006 03 04 (added link to Feminism for Male College Students)