Fathers for Life
Fatherlessness, the lack of natural fathers in children's lives
| Home | In The News | Our Blog | Contact Us | Share

Fathers for Life Site-Search

Site Map (very large file)
Table of Contents
Children—Our most valued assets?
Educating Our Children for the Global Gynarchia
Child Support
Civil Rights & Social Issues
Family Law
Destruction of Families
Divorce Issues
Domestic Violence
Gay Issues
Hate, Hoaxes and Propaganda
Help Lines for Men
Law, Justice and The Judiciary
Mail to F4L
Men's Issues
The Politics of "Sex"
Our Most Popular Pages
Email List
References - Bibliography

You are visitor

since June 19, 2001



Family Wars (PAS) — Footnotes


1. Most of the research to date has shown that the mother is significantly more likely to be the alienating parent and the father the target parent.  However, we note that there is a fair amount of controversy in the field regarding the conclusion that more mothers alienate than fathers, and wish  to emphasize that in many cases we personally have seen, it is the father who alienates and the mother who is the target. 

2. See, Lamb, M.E.(ed.)  In Non-Traditional Families, "Effects of Divorce on Parents & Children" by Hetherington, E.M.; Cox, M.; Cox, R. (1982).  See also, Wallerstein, J. & Kelly, J.S., Surviving the Breakup: How children and Parents Cope with Divorce, (1980); J. Wallerstein & S. Blakeslee, Second Chances: Men, Women and Children a Decade after Divorce: Who Wins, Loses and Why (1989) 

3. Johnston, J.R. & Campbell, L.E.G., Impasses of Divorce "Forward" by J. Wallerstein, p.ix (1988) 

4. Hodges, William F. Interventions for Children of Divorce at 151 (1986). 

5. Gardner, Richard, The Parental Alienation Syndrome (1992). 

6. Johnston, Impasses of Divorce see Endnote #2. 

7. "Families First" is a program currently mandated in several cities/counties in Georgia, Florida, Indiana, Texas, Illinois, Michigan, and Louisiana, among other states. 

8. California (The Family Act, Sec. 4607, The Civil Code), Maine (19 Maine Revised Statutes 214.4), North Carolina (7A North Carolina Revised Statutes 494) and Wisconsin (767.001 Wisconsin Revised Statutes) require mediation for custody cases. 

9. Zirps, Fotena A., Ph.D. Children Cope with Divorce -- Follow-up Study, Cobb County, Families First, Atlanta, Georgia, (1992). 

10. Code of Professional Conduct Rule 2.1. 

11. Code of Professional Conduct Rule 3.1. 

12. American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, Standards of Conduct Rule 2.25 An attorney should not contest child custody or visitation for either financial leverage or vindictiveness. Comment: ..."Proper consideration of the welfare of the children requires that they not be used as pawns in the adversary process.  If despite the attorney's advice the client persists, the attorney should seek to withdraw." 
    Rule 2.27 An attorney should refuse to assist in vindictive conduct toward a spouse or third party and should not do anything to increase the emotional level of the dispute. Comment: ..."If...the client...asks the attorney to engage in conduct the attorney believes to be imprudent or repugnant, the attorney should attempt to convince the client to work toward family harmony or in the interests of the children.  Conduct in the interests of the children or the family will almost always be in the client's long term interests." 

13. American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, Standards of Conduct Rule 2.24:  When issues in a representation affect the welfare of a child, an attorney should not initiate communication with the child, except in the presence of the child's lawyer or guardian ad litem. with court permission, or as necessary to verify facts in motions and pleadings. 

14. Ross v. Gadwah, 131 N.H. 391 (1988). 

15. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. S 1400 et seq. 

16. See N.H. Standards for the Education of Handicap Students, Chapt. Ed. S 1109 (1988) 

17. Hodges, see Endnote #4. There is not enough research on mother absence to reach conclusions at this point in time as the frequency of mother absence is so low that obtaining generalizable samples is virtually impossible. 

18. Wallerstein, Second Chances, see Endnote #2. 

19. Buchanan, C. & Maccoby, E., "Variation in Adjustment to Divorce: The role of feeling caught between Parents" April 1991, Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting for the Society for Research in Child Development, Seattle Washington, April 18-20, 1991. 

20. Perreault v. Cook, 114 N.H. 440 (1974); Howard v. Howard, 124 N.H. 267 (1983). 

21. There is substantial research on adequate or "good-enough" parenting: Hodges, see Endnote #3; Shutz, B.M., Dixon, E.B., Lindenbergen, J.C., Ruther, N.J., Solomon's Sword (1989) 

22. Clawar & Rivlin, Page 142. 

23. Webb v. Knudson, 133 NH 665, 673 (1990). "Children are not chargeable with the misconduct of their parents and should not be uprooted from their home in order to discipline a recalcitrant parent." See also, Houde v. Beckmeyer, 116 NH 719 (1976). 

24. Code of Professional Conduct Rule 3.3 A lawyer shall not knowingly mislead the court or use illegal or false evidence. 

25. Domestic Violence Training for District Court Judges, January, 1990, personal conversation. 

26. This suggestion has been made by Judge Linda Dalianis of the New Hampshire Superior Court. See, Bonser v. Courtney, 124 N.H. 796 (1984) Only a Judge, not a Marital Master, could empanel an advisory jury. 


     Peggie Ward, Ph.D. 
     J. Campbell Harvey, J.D. 
     Slatoff & Ward Psychological Professional Association 
     280 Main Street #310 
     Nashua, NH 03060 

To subscribe to the Custody Newsletter, contact: 

     Village Publishing 
     73 Valley Drive 
     Furlong, PA 18925 

Back to Divorce Issues: Main Page

2001 02 09 (format changes)
2002 03 05 (added link to Table of Contents)