Fathers for Life
Fatherlessness, the lack of natural fathers in children's lives
| Home | In The News | Our Blog | Contact Us | Share

Fathers for Life Site-Search

Site Map (very large file)
Table of Contents
Children—Our most valued assets?
Educating Our Children for the Global Gynarchia
Child Support
Civil Rights & Social Issues
Family Law
Destruction of Families
Divorce Issues
Domestic Violence
Gay Issues
Hate, Hoaxes and Propaganda
Help Lines for Men
Law, Justice and The Judiciary
Mail to F4L
Men's Issues
The Politics of "Sex"
Our Most Popular Pages
Email List
References - Bibliography

You are visitor

since June 19, 2001


Families — Table of Contents

Index to articles, studies and statistics that relate to the traditional nuclear family and to the implementation of the international agenda for the planned destruction of the family


  • It's Official: The Experiment Has Failed

    Experiments in Living: The Fatherless Family
    By Rebecca O'Neill; Sept. 2002, CIVITAS

    For the best part of thirty years we have been conducting a vast experiment with the family, and now the results are in: the decline of the two-parent, married-couple family has resulted in poverty, ill-health, educational failure, unhappiness, anti-social behaviour, isolation and social exclusion for thousands of women, men and children.

    — Rebecca O'Neill

  • The Politics of Fatherhood
    By Stephen Baskerville, Ph.D., Howard University; peer-reviewed article in PS: Political Science and Politics, vol. 35, no. 4 (December 2002).

....Virtually every major social pathology has been linked to fatherlessness: violent crime, drug and alcohol abuse, truancy, teen pregnancy, suicide—all correlate more strongly to fatherlessness than to any other single factor. The majority of prisoners, juvenile detention inmates, high school dropouts, pregnant teenagers, adolescent murderers, and rapists all come from fatherless homes. The connection is so strong that controlling for fatherlessness erases the relationships between race and crime and between low income and crime....

....Fatherlessness and the judicial–bureaucratic machinery connected with it have grown up together as increasingly worldwide phenomena....
(Full Story)

  • Would You Sign This Contract?

An employer can at any time dismiss an employee without justification and have that employee imprisoned if he objects too strongly to his dismissal. For example, if the employee raises his voice in anger he may be arrested for 'violence'. In any event, an employer can dismiss an employee regardless of the circumstances, and at his sole discretion. He can fire him from his job whenever he wishes, no matter how long the employee has served with the company and even if the employee has done absolutely nothing wrong. Further, the employer can insist that the employee is evicted from his own house and never allowed to re-enter it. An employer may further demand that the sacked employee must, under threat of imprisonment, forfeit part of any future income to the employer for some considerable time into the future.

How about the following version?  Do you think that it will be an improvement?

A woman can at any time dismiss her male partner without justification and have that partner imprisoned if he objects too strongly to his dismissal. For example, if he raises his voice in anger he may be arrested for 'domestic violence'. In any event, a woman can dismiss the man regardless of the circumstances and at her sole discretion. She can fire him from his jobs as father and partner whenever she wishes, no matter how long he has served the family and even if he has done absolutely nothing wrong. Further, the woman can insist that the man is evicted from his own house and never allowed to re-enter it. If she has children, a woman may further demand that her sacked partner must, under threat of imprisonment, forfeit part of any future income to the woman and her children for some considerable time into the future - and this is the case even if her children turn out not to be his.

See the extensive discussion of the two "contracts," of which the second one is sadly the reality that feminism gradually imposed on society during the last three decades or so.*   For additional details regarding the reality of today's marriages or, for that matter, any relationship between men and women, refer also to advice for men.
* A note of caution: The discussion of the "contracts" makes extensive references to recent US statistics on spousal murders. The assumption in the discussion is that the statistics pertaining to men and women who became victims of spousal murders are equally valid.  That is a wrong assumption.
   The declining number of men classified as having been murdered by intimates is most likely due to the escalating efforts by feminists to hold women blameless under any and all circumstances.
   Men comprise the vast and overwhelming majority of victims in a very large proportion of unsolved murder cases.  It is quite possible that a large proportion of those male victims of these unsolved murder cases involves victims of spousal murders. 
   Furthermore, women are less likely to be suspected, many times more likely than men to be not prosecuted or to be acquitted, twice as likely as men to use contract killers, and more likely than men to have their murder charges pleaded down to lesser charges such as manslaughter or accidental deaths.
   Therefore many spousal murders committed by women will never show up as domestic violence crimes.
   For a detailed discussion of those circumstances refer to Spousal Homicide and Research, by Eeva Sodhi.
   Most importantly, spousal murders comprise a very small proportion of all murders and an insignificant fraction of all causes of deaths, smaller than the deaths caused by surgical misadventure. (See US Leading Causes of Death)

Lest anyone should think that marriage is the most dangerous of all social circumstances for women to be in, consider that married and widowed women have far greater life expectancies than those who never become married, and that divorced women have a greater risk of dying than those who stay married.

  • The impact of father absence on our children —

Facts and Figures

The link between crime and fatherlessness is astonishing.
By Dave Kopel, Independence Institute, article at FreeRepublic.com "A Conservative News Forum"

  • Study Finds Teen Pregnancy And Crime Levels Are Higher Among Kids From

Fatherless Homes

  • Earnings not limited by income of father — Many factors influence pay of offspring: study

Article by Luiza Chwialkowska, National Post, Friday, November 06, 1998

It appears that family circumstances, such as the presence of a father in the live of a child, and whether the parents moved during the development of a child are controlling influences on the future incomes earned by a child and his social circumstances when he/she is in the prime of his/her life.

  • The myth of the oppressed Japanese woman

Full Story

See also Parents' rights a demographic issue, by COLIN P.A. JONES, Special to The Japan Times, Tuesday, July 18, 2006

  • Family Breakdown in Australia

Full Story
(it's a large document, about 350 kB)

  • Father Facts

What happens when you take Dad out of the family picture? A daily dose of reality from the National Fatherhood Initiative. (Take the time to look at the home page for the URL. It contains a lot of good information Full Story)

  • Male Identity Crisis

Social Engineering Has Produced Killer Kids
Article by Richard Lessner, Manchester, New Hampshire, Union Leader
August 12, 1998 Full Story

A letter from a non-custodial father to his son

See also:

Extended Family

Family Violence

Sex Education

  • Sex Education
    By Barbara Dafoe Whitehead (on the failure of sex education)

  • Sex Education
    By Walter Schneider
    A page for teens that are not being taught what they should be taught, namely that indiscriminate sex and promiscuity are devastating, unhealthy and even deadly.

whiterose.gif (6796 bytes)The White Rose
Thoughts are Free