Fathers for Life
Fatherlessness, the lack of natural fathers in children's lives
| Home | In The News | Our Blog | Contact Us | Share

Fathers for Life Site-Search

Site Map (very large file)
Table of Contents
Children—Our most valued assets?
Educating Our Children for the Global Gynarchia
Child Support
Civil Rights & Social Issues
Family Law
Destruction of Families
Divorce Issues
Domestic Violence
Gay Issues
Hate, Hoaxes and Propaganda
Help Lines for Men
Law, Justice and The Judiciary
Mail to F4L
Men's Issues
The Politics of "Sex"
Our Most Popular Pages
Email List
References - Bibliography

You are visitor

since June 19, 2001


Why is Communism worse than Capitalism? Part 1

From Aaron Burr's e-mail discussion list; 2003 04 24

[Note: To better understand the context of the discussion in the following, it will be a good idea to look up the related diagrams of the patriarchal versus the feminist family model.  They are simple, and easily understood and memorized. —WHS]

The real power in this country has been on the Right for a hundred years or more, and it could be argued rightfully so due to the threat of communism.

Why is Communism worse than Capitalism?

Dear People,

This is a VERY important legal and sociological question to the Father's Rights movement.

First, we must identify things.   Feminism is "communism."  Know that Feminism, Socialism, Communism, and Fascism have different elemental definitions which differentiate one from the other.  They are not the same – however; they all come from the same root.  The best explanation I have come up with is that they are all the same plant, in different stages of growth.  A weed is still a weed, no matter how small or tall it tends to grow.

Feminism, is socialism, which leads to Communism.  The father's rights movement does not understand that Capitalism and Socialism/Communism are completely different.  Like matter and anti-matter – they cannot occupy the same space or territory together.

Feminism/Socialism/Communism's main dictate is tribal in nature (Hillary Clinton's "Village").

Marxism and Feminism are one, and that one is Marxism.

—Heidi Hartmann and Amy Bridges,
The unhappy marriage of Marxism and Feminism. Chapt. 1.

Feminism, Socialism, and Communism are one in the same, and Socialist/Communist government is the goal of feminism."

Toward a Feminist Theory of the State,
Catharine A. MacKinnon, 1989, First Harvard University Press Page 10.

Its first mandate is to control mankind's free will and the resources of economic development.  Know that Marx's and Engels' first goal was to deconstruct both the home and family.  This is the first LAW of Feminism and socialism/communism: destroy the rule of the father.  From Chapter Three of my book:

We must understand, that feminism, is socialism/communism.[1]   Indeed, where Karl Marx and every communist on earth want to create a class struggle in order to control the means of production, feminists just replace class with gender.[2]  Where communists attempted global conquest, now, the feminists create a silent "constant state of war" implemented silently against every home and family via feminism.[3]  I find it very odd that other [of] their party intellectuals have also made this same connection:

Everything feminists advocate was advocated by the Communist Party of the United States in the 1940's and 1950's. Betty Friedan, author of The Feminine Mystique (1963) and founder of modern feminism, hid the fact that she had been a Communist activist for 20 years. (See feminist historian Kate Weigand's, Red Feminism: American Communism and the Making of Women's Liberation, Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 2001). Feminism simply transfers Marxist class analysis to gender. The aim is the same: the "patriarchy" (white men, capitalism) is the source of all evil and must be destroyed ("transformed"). Women (the proletariat) and anyone else deemed "oppressed" (gays, people of color) must be handed position and power on a silver platter.[4]

"Feminism is the intellectual organization of gender hatred, just as Marxism was the intellectual organization of class hatred. Feminism's business is fashioning weapons to be used against men in society, education, politics, law and divorce court. The feminist aim is to overthrow "patriarchal tyranny." In this undertaking, the male's civil rights count for no more than those of the bourgeoisie in Soviet Russia or the Jews in National Socialist Germany."[5]


[1] [S]econd-wave feminism stands as an excellent example of a 1960s movement that blossomed from the seeds that Communist women germinated thirty years earlier.  American Communism and the Making of Women's Liberation, by Henry Makow, PhD., October 3, 2001; http://www.savethemales.ca/031001.html

[2] Sexuality is to feminism what work is to Marxism. Toward a Feminist Theory of the State, by Catharine A. MacKinnon, 1989, First Harvard University Press, p. 3.

[3] They will subvert all foreign nations using this same gender warfare as well.  I believe this is what is presently occurring foundationally in the Middle East.

[4] http://www.savethemales.ca/uw/main.html

[5] What civil rights has wrought.  Paul Craig Roberts, July 26, 2000.  Townhall.com - Creators Syndicate.

Feminism, Socialism and Communism are the exact opposites from each other.  Like matter and anti-matter – they are totally disparate and cannot occupy the same area. 

COMMUNISM.  "A system of social organization in which goods are held in common, the opposite of the system of private property; communalism, any theory or system of social organization involving common ownership of agents of production of industry, the latter of which theories is referred to in the popular use of the word "communism" while the scientific usage sometimes conforms to the first alone and sometimes alternates between the first and second; also the principles and theories of the Communist Party, especially in Soviet Russia."  Feinglass v. Reinecke, D.C.Ill., 48 F.Supp. 438, 440.

Dr. Milton Freedman, a Nobel-prize-winning laureate, noted in his work (quoted in my first book), that "There are only certain sociological-political systems which can be combined....People thinking that we can have a Socialist-Democracy, are deluding themselves." [paraphrased].

Please note the delusion as quoted by Herbert Hoover:  "The Socialists claim they would preserve democratic institutions and all other freedoms except economic freedom."  (The Challenge to Liberty, by Herbert Hoover, Charles Scribner's Sons, N.Y., 1934, pg. 59)  They are lying.  If we read "The Law" by Frederick Bastiat, he clearly denotes that the socialists will use altruism "to gain inroads into the rights of all property" and transfer them to government.  The socialist will allow NO freedom-and will always devolve to the limits of their perversity (Fascism)...which is what this nation is experienc[ing] now.   [Don't believe me?  Try and take a legal product, and smoke it in a restaurant.  And they are not stopping there.  They are far from over from "saving us."]  Any Feminist government is a socialist government which devolves to Communism, then institutes fascism to support it.

However; under the system of CAPITALISM, you NEED the family.  Capitalism uses peoples individual needs in which to have them accrue wealth.  To have Capitalism, you need families.  You need a free society.  You NEED sexual regulation.   Where CAPITALISM needs all members of the family to voluntarily submit to Patriarchy (sexual regulation) the feminists/communists NEED to destroy the family:

"The nuclear family must be destroyed, and people must find better ways of living together. ... Whatever its ultimate meaning, the break-up of families now is an objectively revolutionary process. ... "Families have supported oppression by separating people into small, isolated units, unable to join together to fight for common interests."  (Functions of the Family, by Linda Gordon, WOMEN: A Journal of Liberation, Fall, 1969.)

Capitalism is probably best represented by the implementing of Protestant Calvinist   thought in the United States.  That a man will live a upright and moral life, that he will have leadership responsibilities, and that he will absorb himself in his work, and from that – he will amass a great amount of wealth, and from that wealth, he will not only ascend his family's condition, but his community as well.  This infrastructure has built the freest and most highly competitive and wealthy nation(s) which has ever existed.  The key is the accrual of wealth IN THE MASSES, (where the common man became the bourgeoisie).  To institute this free government, YOU NEED FAMILIES.  As families are the social cells which institute both Capitalism and freedom.  This is done under the structure of Patriarchy.

It is not like you can remove these things.  [Please go to my free e-Book, in the last Chapter (21) and look for the KRELL WELFARE MACHINE charts (two of them) – you will see that the Matriarchal Society (Feminist/Socialist/Communist) is directly the opposite of the Patriarchal State (Capitalist, Free American)   The components of one can only go with the other.   In other words, you cannot have a free independent media which informs the public – and then have a Matriarchal / Feminist society.  In Hillary Clinton's Village, the Media can ONLY be a propaganda arm of the government. (It cannot allow "information" to be given to the people.)  This is why when she runs for office, she has her personally selected members who travel along with her in three separate buses, to "act" like a random community when shown on TV, but who are in fact propaganda shills, there to only ask her "intelligent" questions she already knows the answers to.  (However, get her in front of a real crowd – like the Post 9-11 debacle where she made an impromptu appearance in front of the Police and Firemen of New York City – and you will see her get booed off the stage in a deafening cacophony of disapproval.)  You cannot have marriage, and have women's rights.   You cannot have savings, and have a government with a huge 7 Trillion dollar debt.   You cannot have an intelligent society under Socialism, ergo, you need a dolt school system which is dead-last in world TMSS scores...under Patriarchy, you have highly efficient schools and an educated public as Thomas Jefferson mandated, and which this nation implemented for almost 200 continuous years (until the advent of modern feminism within our schools).

Capitalism is NOT a perfect system.  Patriarchy is not a perfect social system.   HOWEVER, TO DATE, IT IS THE GREATEST SOCIAL VEHICLE TO ALLOW THE INDIVIDUAL TO SUPERCEDE OVER THE MOB.  IT IS THE MOST SUCCESSFUL [of the] SYSTEMS THAT HAVE FREEDOM INGRAINED WITHIN THEM AS A BASIC DESIGN.  IT IS SELF-REGULATING FOR THE GREATEST PART; AND IT IMBUES THINGS SUCH AS CHIVALRY AND CALVINISM, WHICH DOES GREAT THINGS FOR ANY NATION.  These systems demand free-sovereign families.   Whereas, feminism/socialism/communism has to destroy families in order to "seize control of production" (wealth).

The templates of freedom are ingrained within Capitalism and Patriarchy.  The archetypes of oppression are contained within feminism/socialism/communism.   In fact, they lead to huge oppressive "statist" governments whom brutally control their populaces "from cradle to grave."  Where freedom is constrained and overthrown.  Where huge prison systems and government infrastructures are instituted, groomed and maintained...

You cannot have huge prison populations – and have a free government.

Clearly, feminism is worse than Capitalism.  It's time that people understand the importance of fatherhood.  Fatherhood is a basic template of freedom.   It is very much the component of Capitalism and Patriarchy.  And Fatherhood is the enemy of feminism – there is no dispute of this fact.

It is clear where fatherhood's interests must lie.  We must support Capitalism and Patriarchy UNCONDITIONALLY and excoriate and expunge anything in opposition to these necessities of all free societies.

Hope this helps.


There were responses to those comments.  One of them raised objections to the claim that "feminism is communism" and stated that such a thing is clearly not possible, that feminism is for and about women.  It is a must to read that and Aaron Burr's refutation of that objection and others in that response. —WHS

My Notes:

In WHY MEN ARE THE WAY THEY ARE, Warren Farrell explains that men and women are equally powerless but that men and boys are being indoctrinated to admire women and to follow career paths that enable men to give women what women want.  For example:

What Are Boys Good For?

What does a teenage girl learn to give to a boy? Let's look at a thirteen-page spread in Teen-the Christmas 1984 issue. Approx­imately seventy presents are mentioned, with an average price of about thirty dollars (over two thousand dollars' [close to US$5,000 in 2007 dollars — F4L] worth of presents). Only one is for a male-pajamas for a baby boy. As with Ms., no presents for boyfriends.
    There are several teenage boys shown in the pictures. One admires a girl while she admires herself in the mirror; another is towing a girl's brand-new car. The same use of men as in Self.
Is the girl in the Teen spread helping the boy who has attached her car to a tow truck? No. She drapes herself over the tow truck. And how does she learn to handle a stressful situation? The caption explains: "If a stressful situation causes complexion concerns, keep skin under control with Noxzema Acne 12. And pass the time in an easy-to-wear wardrobe!"
    All twelve days of Christmas run the same pattern: "Keep tabs on your weight," "File your nails ... ," "Massage your hands," "Massage your feet," "Turn heads in your direction by keeping lips lusciously lubricated .... " What does he get? Nothing is mentioned but her beauty. What lessons does he learn? Admire and rescue. [Emphasis by F4L] In Teen. In Ms. In Self.
Do teenage boys' magazines show a girl towing his brand-new car, while he drapes himself over her tow truck and worries about his acne? Hardly.
    In men's magazines there are only a few gifts for men to buy women. Remember the principle of the De Beers transfer. She chooses the diamond and chooses among the men her beauty power can attract to buy it. Which is why his ads are for how to become successful enough to buy whatever she chooses; hers are to become beautiful enough to be able to make the choice of both the gift and the man to buy the gift. Men's magazines do not feature many gifts for women because men are expected to do the buying after consulting the women, not the magazine, and to concentrate their energies on making the money.

WHY MEN ARE THE WAY THEY ARE, By Warren Farrell, p 34-35

Once they become men (or perhaps even sooner), men (or boys) begin to catch on.  For example:

Why is changing a light bulb always a guy's job? Because women have more important things to do - like making men feel useful and important by giving them things to do, like changing light bulbs.

How many divorced men does it take to change a light bulb? None. They never get the house anyway.

Edmonton Journal,
2007 08 28, p. B2, Venting
(more at edmontonjournal.com Online Extras - Venting)

It will take quite some time yet, however, before a majority of society gets Warren Farrell's message expressed in the following.

One of the fascinating parts about men is our tendency to subject ourselves to war, physical abuse, and psychological abuse and call it "power." The ability to be totally out of control while continuing to view ourselves as the ones with the power can have certain advantages to a woman. As expressed in this poem:

One-Night Stand

He bought me drinks all evening
   in response to just a wink
Then accepted my invitation to
   repair my kitchen sink
Then I brought him into beddy-bye
   to get a little sex
Then couldn't help but smile
   when he called it conquest!

WHY MEN ARE THE WAY THEY ARE, By Warren Farrell, p. 289

That story, translated into a joke that is far more ironic than it is funny, goes like this:

An Irishman an Englishman and a Scotsman were sitting in a bar in Sydney. The view was fantastic, the beer excellent, and the food exceptional. "But" said the Scotsman, "I still prefer the pubs back home. Why, in Glasgow there's a little bar called McTavish's. Now the landlord there goes out of his way for the locals so much that when you buy 4 drinks he will buy the 5th drink for you."

"Well," said the Englishman "at my local, the Red Lion, the barman there will buy you your 3rd drink after you buy the first 2."

"Ahhh that's nothin'," said the Irishman, "Back home in Dublin there's Ryan's Bar. Now the moment you set foot in the place they'll buy you a drink, then another, all the drinks you like. Then when you've had enough drink they'll take you upstairs and see that you get laid. All on the house."

The Englishman and Scotsman immediately pour scorn on the Irishman's claims. He swears every word is true.

"Well," said the Englishman, "Did this actually happen to you?" 

"Not myself personally, no" said the Irishman, "but it did happen to my sister."

found at angryharry.com

Men's problem is that women's "powerlessness" has been amply addressed throughout the history of evolution, intensively so since the advent of radical feminism [*], but that men's powerlessness received little or no attention. Instead, men curry women's favors by giving women gifts, even the gift of men's lives.
   While in the past men were enticed to live up to the social duties imposed upon them with promises that they would be paid back for that through society paying them appreciation, honour and respect, today — thanks to decades of feminist slandering of men, intended to "increase" the social value of women — men are being vilified for being men, and not much else matters.

* If the term "radical feminism" (a.k.a. Marxist- or socialist-feminism) is somewhat new to you, you need to expand your knowledge.  After all, radical feminism, the currently controlling faction of feminism, governs just about everything that is happening in your life.  See,

Carey Roberts column

Carey Roberts is an analyst and commentator on political correctness. His best-known work was an exposé on Marxism and radical feminism.

Carey Roberts' best-known work, his exposé on Marxism and radical feminism, is not necessarily easy to find, but this link will help with that. (Some of the URLs for the article series appear to keep changing.  For that reason the identified link leads to an Internet search for the series.  The first or second link in the return list will most likely lead you to the series.)

See also:

whiterose.gif (6796 bytes)The White Rose
Thoughts are Free

Posted 2003 04 25
2003 04 29 (added reference and link to diagrams of the patriarchal versus the feminist family model)
2006 03 04 (added link to Feminism for Male College Students)
2007 07 29 (added entry for WHY MEN ARE THE WAY THEY ARE)
2007 12 14 (reformated)