Fathers for Life
Fatherlessness, the lack of natural fathers in children's lives
| Home | In The News | Our Blog | Contact Us | Share

Fathers for Life Site-Search

Site Map (very large file)
Table of Contents
Children—Our most valued assets?
Educating Our Children for the Global Gynarchia
Child Support
Civil Rights & Social Issues
Family Law
Destruction of Families
Divorce Issues
Domestic Violence
Gay Issues
Hate, Hoaxes and Propaganda
Help Lines for Men
Law, Justice and The Judiciary
Mail to F4L
Men's Issues
The Politics of "Sex"
Our Most Popular Pages
Email List
References - Bibliography

You are visitor

since June 19, 2001


USA Suicide Rates of the Sexes for the Years 1980 to 1996

The graphs shown on this web page were constructed from suicide deaths information published by the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control and from US Census population data published by the US Bureau of the Census.  The suicide rates are sex specific.  They are standardized on respective populations of 100,000 of each sex in each age group.  They are not based on the routine customarily used to downplay the differences between the sexes with respect to sex-specific suicide rates.  The graphs do not reflect government calculations of suicide rates.  That is because sex-specific suicide rates published by government sources are very seriously misleading.[1]

Other Sources of Information:

Would a US Federal Agency Mislead the Public and Endanger Children to Protect a Cabinet Secretary's Feminist Agenda?



Suicide rates reflect the proportion of a given population that commits or committed suicide.  The rates are generally so low that they are standardized by relating them to population groups of size 100,000 each to make them comprehensible and to permit meaningful and realistic comparisons between populations of equal size.
   If the calculation of a suicide rate is based on the standardized population of a given peer group, meaningful comparisons can be made between suicide rates of sub-groups within an age group to permit comparisons of the likelihood of each sub-group to commit suicide.  These comparisons will permit to establish the determination of accurate relative risks of each sub-group, such as how likely an average man is to commit suicide as to the likelihood of an average woman in that group to kill herself, or, how many times more likely is a man within a population to commit suicide than is a woman.
    On the other hand, if the calculation of a suicide rate is based on the overall population containing all sub-groups within the age group, such as members of both sexes within the age group 85 and over, then all we will learn from the suicide rates calculated for each sex is the likelihood that a given suicide victim within that age group is a man or a woman.

The suicide data posted at the NCIPC web site contains information on suicide rates that relates to the sexes in each age group.  Unfortunately, those rates are calculated on the basis of the total population segment comprising both sexes in each age group.  Therefore the suicide rates for men as well as for women are not quite accurate in any of the age groups, but on account of the small segment of men in the older age groups the rates are exceptionally misleading.  They'll show, with respect to the overall population in each group, what proportion committed suicide but not how likely it is that a given man or woman commits suicide.
    That may be acceptable for some demographers, but it isn't satisfactory for anyone who wants to know what proportion of men within the population of men in that age group committed suicide.  Anyone who is truly concerned about the welfare of older men would care enough to want to know accurate suicide rates and not rates that contain a very serious bias.

To illustrate the fallacy in the "sex-specific" suicide rates at the NCIPC web site, consider an age group that consists of 99 women and one man.
    According to the rules that were used to calculate the suicide rates shown at the NCIPC web site, if that single man were to kill himself, the corresponding suicide rate for men would be 1,000 per a population of 100,000 men and women -- a reason for concern.  (As an aside, contrary to popular perception, the man would be very likely to kill himself.  Think about it.)
    However, the true suicide rate for all men in that sector, extrapolated for men only and not for the general population, should be 100,000.
    If  three of the 99 women were to kill themselves, that would translate to a suicide rate of 3,000 when extrapolated to a population of 100,000 men and women, no doubt reason for even greater concern for the fate of women.  If the suicide rate for the women were to be extrapolated to a population of 100,000 women only, their standardized suicide rate is not much higher.  It would then be 3,030.3 for a population of 100,000 women.
    The relative risk for suicide that the population of men poses in relation to that of the population of women in the example case is correctly 100,000 : 3,030.3 or 33 : 1.  Men in that population would be 33 times more likely than women to commit suicide.
    However, if the calculation of the respective suicide rates for the sexes were based on the routine used to calculate the suicide rates shown at the NCIPC web site, the relative risk for men in the population in the example would not be that but rather 1,000 to 3,000 or 0.33 to one.  That would underestimate the correct relative risk for men by a factor of 99.  That should be of great concern to anyone and be a serious incentive to perform the calculations correctly instead.

The sex-specific suicide rates from the NCIPC web site were for that reason not reflected in any graphs here.  The graphs shown on this page do reflect correct and true suicide rates that are truly specific for the population of each sex, calculated by using census figures for each age group and for the population of each sex within that, for each of the years of the period.

1999 07 23
2001 02 11 (format changes)